Buying

The Cost of In-Store Betting Displays: What Drives the Price

Carthage Team· 3 June 2026· 7 min read
Retail display technology pricing and value concept

There is no single price for a betting-shop display system, which is exactly why the question is worth answering properly. The number depends on a few clear factors, and the biggest mistake is comparing suppliers on the install quote alone. Here is what actually drives the cost, and where the expensive surprises tend to hide.

Why there is no single price

A display estate is not an off-the-shelf product. The cost reflects how many screens you run, what data they show, and the technology underneath them. Two shops can pay very different amounts for what looks like the same wall of screens, because the things that drive the price sit behind the glass.

The three things that drive the price

Almost every quote comes down to these:

  1. How many screens. Window, main wall, counter and secondary positions, multiplied across your branches. The obvious driver, and the easiest to estimate.
  2. Which data feeds. Live odds, racing and results carry licensing and integration cost. The more real-time and the more sports and games you cover, the higher the floor.
  3. The hardware model. Proprietary media players plus support contracts versus low-cost screens running a browser. This is usually the largest swing in total cost, and the one buyers underweight.

Where the hidden costs hide

The install quote is the visible cost. The hidden ones accumulate afterwards, and they almost all come from locked-in systems:

  • Support contracts that recur whether or not anything improves.
  • Change requests billed individually because you cannot edit your own screens.
  • Hardware replacement on the vendor's terms when a proprietary box fails.
  • Downtime when an estate drifts out of date and someone has to put it right.

Key takeaway

Compare suppliers on total cost of ownership over three years, not the install quote. The hardware model, browser-based or proprietary, is usually where the real long-term cost is decided.

The honest way to compare: total cost of ownership

A cheap install on a locked-in platform can cost far more over three years than a slightly higher one that you control. The fair comparison adds up everything: hardware, support, the cost of changes, and the cost of keeping the estate consistent. Much of that last point is covered in keeping in-store screens updated across every branch.

Why browser-based usually costs less to run

Browser-based displays run on commodity screens with no proprietary box to buy, support or replace, and changes you can make yourself. That removes most of the hidden costs above, which is why the model tends to win on total cost of ownership. The trade-offs are laid out in browser-based vs hardware display systems, and the full picture in the complete guide to in-store displays for betting shops.

Frequently asked questions

How much does an in-store betting display system cost?

It varies with the number of screens, the data feeds you need, and whether the system uses proprietary hardware or runs in a browser. The most useful comparison is total cost of ownership over three years, not the install quote alone.

Why is the install quote misleading?

Because it omits the recurring costs: support contracts, billed change requests, hardware replacement and downtime. These accumulate after install, mostly on locked-in systems, and often outweigh the upfront figure.

Why are browser-based displays cheaper to run?

They use commodity screens with no proprietary box to buy, support or replace, and you can change content yourself. That removes most of the recurring costs that drive up the total over time.

See it on your own wall

Carthage builds browser-based display systems for betting retail: sport, racing, numbers and multi-game boards, rolled out across every branch with no specialist hardware.

Book a Demo